![]() ![]() We could just as well compute and round (up or down) to the nearest integer:Įxcellent! Now we can compute Fibonacci numbers directly, without computing all the previous ones. The proof of Theorem 6.46 below shows that, despite being a nullset, the set RUb is uncountable and. So, what’s happening here is that is just a tiny bit bigger or smaller than, and subtracting off the (very small) gives exactly. We can even simplify this further by noting that since has an absolute value smaller than 1, in general is very small. ![]() Now, consider subtracting one from the other:īut now it is a simple matter to solve for :Īmazing! It seems weird that a formula to generate integers involves all these strange non-integers like and, but there it is. The Fibonacci sequence is dened as follows: F0 0 F1 1 Fi Fi 1+Fi 2 i 2 (1) The goal is to show that Fn 1 p 5 pnqn (2) where p 1+ p 5 2 and q 1 p 5 2 : (3) Observe that substituting n 0, gives 0as per Denition 1 and 0as per Formula 2 likewise, substituting n 1, gives 1 from both and hence, the base cases hold. However, Equation1. There are only d2 possible pairs of remainders so this sequence must eventually repeat. Consider the sequence of the pairs of remainders when dividing F n and F n+1 by d. In fact, the key to understanding it is the “golden powers” identity from my last post:įirst of all, we note that every single piece of the above identity’s proof works for just as well as for, so it is also true that 1.4 Fibonacci Entry Points We can now prove Conjecture1. Such a formula would be called an explicit formula, and in general, you could devote a whole graduate-level class to the topic of turning recursive formulas into explicit ones! However, finding an explicit Fibonacci formula isn’t as difficult as all that. Doesn’t it make you wonder whether there’s a formula we could use to calculate directly in terms of n, without having to calculate previous Fibonacci numbers? Remember that the Fibonacci numbers are defined recursively, that is, each Fibonacci number is given in terms of previous ones. Don’t worry, this post isn’t going to be X-rated! By explicit I mean not recursive.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |